Wednesday, 3 July 2013

Binchester 2013: Carved stone head

Many of you may have found your way to this blog as a result of the press coverage we've received about our recent discovery of a carved stone head of an unknown Roman god at Binchester. Inevitably in the various interviews we've done, David Mason and myself have not been able to go into much depth about the find, so I'd thought I'd try and summarise the current state of knowledge about it. The head, which is made of sandstone, was found in a dump of late Roman refuse that had been thrown into one of the rooms of a probable bath-house in the civilian settlement that lies outside the Roman fort at Binchester. This building was terraced into the hillside and all the rooms we've looked at have been filled with massive deposits consisting mainly of alternate layers of butchery waste and rough stone surfaces. These dumps are around 6' in depth. The head was part of one of these stone layers and as such is clearly not in its original context. However, there is reason to belief that it may have originated from this general area. A couple of years ago we found part of an inscription nearby that appears to record the dedication of a small shrine by the commander of the cavalry regiment based at the fort. In the same sequence of late Roman dumping we also found a small Roman altar, and earlier this week we found a fragment of a pot with an applique pottery wheel on it that may have ritual connections to the cult of the Romano-Celtic 'wheel god' perhaps best known from the north of England in his guise as Taranis. This all suggests some ritual activity in the immediate area or more likely within the bathhouse itself. However, at some point, probably by the 4th century, the bath and shrine had fallen out of use and the head ended up incorporated into these waste deposits. The head itself is sandstone and reasonably well carved although not of the highest order of Roman sculpture. This can be seen clearly when compared with its closest parallel, the head of Antenociticus from the Roman fort at Benwell on Hadrian's Wall. The Benwell head is clearly more proficiently carved, but both share the similar hair style and lentoid eyes, although the eyes from the Binchester eyes are far more 'googly'! The Benwell head is also clearly part of a larger statue; parts of the neck survive showing it had been detached from its torso. However, the Binchester head has no neck and no sign of a scar in this area. Instead, it seems to have always been intended to simply be a detached head and its flat base means it sits easily on flat surfaces. A number of people have suggested that it has an African appearance, primarily because of the modelling of the nose and mouth. The lips are certainly fuller than the fairly tight lips of the Antenociticus head. However, it is difficult to be certain how far this was an intentional decision aimed at depicting ethnicity. It is also worth noting that the nose and mouth appear to have been slightly damaged in antiquity, flattening them off slightly. We have canvassed the opinions of various experts opinion has been pretty evenly split. So, do we know who this god was? No - despite the broad similarities with the Antenociticus head, I don't think we can say that the Binchester head is meant to represent him. Nonetheless, they are both clearly drawing on the same broad artistic repertoire that combines both classical and more indigenous Romano-British artistic styles. I am fairly happy that it is meant to represent a local god - although the depictions of local gods in Roman Britain were often conflated or paired with better known Classical deities. As such it is rather fitting that we found the head in the civilian settlement, one of the key arenas in which the Roman Empire through its army and administrators would have come face to face with the native people of Northern England.

4 comments:

  1. These are wonderful images of the deity's head that I have not found elsewhere online. Would it be acceptable to use them in a blog for the Transparent Language Latin Blog?

    Also, I was wondering if there was anyway I could contact or interview the undergraduate about finding this piece for the post as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Brittany- yes please feel free to use the images (but do put a link back to this blog as well). If you email me (my email is easy to find with Google) I'll try and put you in contact with the student who found it- cheers David

      Delete
  2. Thank you so much! I have emailed you and look forward to your response. I enjoy this blog immensely along with your latest interview on BBC 5 Live Breakfast.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To know more about Chief Dr Lucky you can visit his website (https://chiefdrluckyherbaltherapy.wordpress.com/)
     
     A friend that suffered from Herpes and was cure with the help of this great herbal doctor Chief Lucky so i decided to contact him for help in getting rid of my families genital herpes virus 1/2 which i did and all i was told to provide was just some useful information and some materials used in preparation of the natural cure and that i did and now i am the happiest person on earth because i am writing this testimony of mine with joy and happiness in my heart to the whole world to know that natural remedy is real because i am a living testimony of Chief Lucky traditional herbal cure and i want you all to contact Chief Lucky via his email: chiefdrlucky@gmail.com or WhatsApp him +2348132777335 am sure he will help you too.

    ReplyDelete